Orgasm.com » Stoya http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog Orgasm Free Porn Blog Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:00:03 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Religious Sites More Dangerous Than Porn http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog/2012/05/01/religious-sites-more-dangerous-than-porn/ http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog/2012/05/01/religious-sites-more-dangerous-than-porn/#comments Tue, 01 May 2012 19:47:53 +0000 Gordon McCord http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog/?p=7454 In hilarious news, it turns out religion is much more dangerous for you than porn. At least, on the Internet it is. Symantec has just released its Internet Security Threat Report which outlines all of the major threats, hacks, and related statistics for the past year. And, well, it turns out those religious followers have been very naughty boys and girls. Either that, or they have no idea how to keep their sites clean.

symantec-most-dangerous-sites

According to the report, the average number of security threats on a religious site was 115, while a porn site only carried around 25 threats on average. On top of this, only 2.4 percent of adult sites carried infections compared to 20 percent of blogs. This placed pornographic sites as the 10th most frequently exploited type of website. Yes, that’s dead last on Symantec’s list.

Symantec even spelled it out themselves in their report: “religious and ideological sites were found to have triple the average number of threats per infected site than adult/pornographic sites. We hypothesize that this is because pornographic website owners already make money from the Internet and, as a result, have a vested interest in keeping their sites malware-free–it’s not good for repeat business.”

Of course, we also think this could have something to do with that study that showed that atheists score more IQ points than religious people–clearly enough IQ points to consider a little malware prevention.

jesus-silly-believers

Here’s to religious people and their ability to make the Internet worse…on multiple levels! Let’s all look at porn instead.

jenna-haze-fucking

Just in case the look in Jenna Haze‘s eyes isn’t enough for you…here’s some double penetration with Stoya.

stoya-double-penetration-cowgirl

Still not enough for you? Okay. Well, here’s a little Belladonna / Rebecca Linares girl on girl action. You know…just in case you hadn’t gotten enough malware-free Internet already.

belladonna-rebecca-linares-lesbian-dildo

]]> 0 Where is Stoya These Days? http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog/2010/03/04/where-is-stoya/ http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog/2010/03/04/where-is-stoya/#comments Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:11:44 +0000 glennb http://www.orgasm.com/free-porn-blog/?p=779 I know my attention span is short, but some of you may recall that Stoya was starting to take a rather drastic edge away from Sasha Grey in regards to my ridiculous porn-crushes, and then suddenly she just disappeared! Where the hell is Stoya and what has she done with my fantasy fuck canvas?

Xcritic has announced that Stoya is back to writing up a blog for them, a blog that apparently was pushed upon her by those in charge of her “brand.”

I like Stoya. I like that she’s beautiful. I like that she’s in porn. I like that she likes Science Fiction. I kinda like or don’t like or don’t really know what to like about her maybe dating Marilyn Manson. And we have something in common. Namely that a certain awesome guy also writes a blog, with a heavy slant towards free internet porn.

But she seems very driven on her privacy and I fear that she may find it too difficult to keep her “offline” persona completely separated from her public one. Don’t get me wrong…I get it, and understand it. I guess I’m just afraid that all of you big bad monsters in the real world might impede on my own Stoya pleasure by driving her into seclusion where only people like herself and maybe a boyfriend get to look at her nipples and girlie parts. That is a world I just don’t want to have to face.

Luckily for all of us she is available via Twitter, Facebook and her blog on XCritic. Just remember that I was here first…

]]>
0